In this case we are in Chelsea in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea where a homeowner had their planning application refused for a second floor conservatory extension.
The application was originally refused by the Council on the 5th of February with two key reasons given for the decision.
First the Council said that the proposed conservatory due to its location size and amount of glazing would be unsympathetic and out of character with the existing property and the Conservation Area.
They claimed it would not be subordinate to the original building and would harm the character of the area in conflict with a number of local plan policies.
Second, they argued that the amount of glazing would cause excessive light glare and spill into neighbouring homes which they said would harm the living conditions of nearby residents.
The client contacted HEAL Planning for a free no obligation consultation with one of our planning appeal assessment officers.
After a review of the case and the associated documents we confirmed there were grounds to appeal and we prepared a written proposal to help the client make an informed decision before proceeding.
Once instructed we prepared and submitted a professionally prepared appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. The Inspector visited the site on the 27th May and issued the decision on the 5th June.
The result the appeal was allowed and planning permission was granted. The Inspector found that the conservatory was small in scale and not dominant and that although the terrace had a uniform front, the rear of the buildings showed much more variation.
Importantly the Inspector noted that the conservatory replaced an earlier structure and that its overall impact was neutral compared to what was there before.
They also found that the increase in glazing did not harm the area, especially given the surrounding buildings already had many windows and glazed features.
On the issue of light glare the Inspector disagreed with the Council pointing out that the urban setting already featured extensive glazing and light sources from nearby homes and even a medical centre.
They concluded the conservatory would not worsen conditions and would not result in unacceptable light pollution.
A condition was added requiring the conservatory to remain timber framed and white painted to ensure it continues to fit in visually.
With all factors considered the Inspector concluded that the development preserved the character of the area complied with relevant planning policies and would not harm neighbouring living conditions.
This is a fantastic example of how planning decisions can be successfully challenged when the case is approached with the right evidence strategy and expertise.
At HEAL Planning we specialise in preparing bespoke appeals that directly address the refusal reasons and planning policy context.
If you have received a planning refusal and want to explore your options we offer a free no obligation consultation so you can make an informed decision before proceeding.
Retrospective 2nd Storey Conservatory Planning Appeal in Conservation Area Kensington Chelsea
Covering all of England and Wales. Start your planning appeal today, without delay! Call us on 01743 369911
