Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts tagged as “Extension Planning Appeal”

PRIOR Approval Planning Appeal London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Case Study

This planning application was originally validated by London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council on the 17th June and refused on the 20th July for a PRIOR Approval application for a Single Storey rear Extension. This type of appeal is a householder appeal and as such has 12 weeks for the appeal to be submitted from the decision notice date. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better, we are often unable to accept any appeals that have less than 2 weeks left to appeal, as this would provide insufficient time to produce the appeal to the standard we work to. The refusal reasons given by London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council were that The Local Planning Authority considered that; The proposed extension, by virtue of its excessive depth and…

Rear Extension and Front Porch Planning Appeal Arun District Council

This planning application was originally validated by Arun District Council on the 27th January and refused on the 7th April for a Rear, Side and Front Extension and Erection of a Detached Garage and Store. This type of appeal is a householder appeal and as such has 12 weeks for the appeal to be submitted from the decision notice date. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better, we are often unable to accept any appeals that have less than 2 weeks left to appeal, as this would provide insufficient time to produce the appeal to the standard we work to. The refusal reasons given by Arun District Council were that The Local Planning Authority considered that; The extension by reason of its scale, design and positioning on site has a…

East Suffolk Council Rear Side Front Extension and Detached Garage Planning Appeal Case Study

This planning application was originally validated by East Suffolk Council on the 28th January and refused on the 26th March for a Rear, Side and Front Extension and Erection of a Detached Garage and Store. This type of appeal is a householder appeal and as such has 12 weeks for the appeal to be submitted from the decision notice date. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better, we are often unable to accept any appeals that have less than 2 weeks left to appeal, as this would provide insufficient time to produce the appeal to the standard we work to. The refusal reasons given by East Suffolk Council were that The Local Planning Authority considered that; The proposed development, due to its height, scale, massing and proximity to the eastern…

Wrexham Planning Appeal For A Retrospective Application Refused at Committee

This planning application was originally validated by Wrexham County Borough Council on the 14th December and refused on the 4th October at committee for a Retrospective application for Outbuilding, Front Porch, Wall, Boundary Fence and Pergola. The committee went against the advice of their planning officers who recommended approval of this application. As such after carful consideration we also recommended that not only our client appeal the refusal but additionally we put in a costs application for our client to attempt to gain the appeal costs back for them. This planning appeal was classed as a House Holder appeal and as such the appellant had 12 weeks from the refusal date to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. Additionally with this case being a retrospective application, we were mindful of a potential enforcement notice being issued ,and were in contact with the planning office at Wrexham to ensure that an enforcement…

Conservation Area Side Extension Planning Appeal London Borough of Hounslow Case Study

This planning application was originally validated by London Borough of Hounslow Council on the 6th September and refused on the 8th November for a Part Single Storey, Part Two Storey side extension. This type of appeal is a householder appeal and as such has 12 weeks for the appeal to be submitted from the decision notice date. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better, we are often unable to accept any appeals that have less than 2 weeks left to appeal, as this would provide insufficient time to produce the appeal to the standard we work to. The refusal reasons given by London Borough of Hounslow Council were that The Local Planning Authority considered that; The proposal, by means of scale and poor design, results in an excessively large, incongruous…

Two Storey Side Extension and Single Storey rear Extension to a Semi Detached House Planning Appeal Sheffield City Council

This planning application was originally validated by Sheffield City Council on the 8th April and refused on the 23rd August for a Two storey side extension and single storey rear extension to a semi detached house. This planning appeal was classed as a House Holder appeal and as such the appellant had 12 weeks from the refusal date to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better. The refusal reasons given by Sheffield City Council were that The Local Planning Authority consider that the proposed two-storey side extension would be overbearing in relation to the adjoining residential property due to the separation distance between, and it would therefore result in an unacceptable effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of that adjoining property. As such…

Loft Conversion with Dormer and Ridge Height Increase London Borough Greenwich Case Study

This planning application was originally validated by Royal Borough of Greenwich Council on the 13th June and refused on the 13th August for a Loft conversion incorporating rear dormer window, outrigger dormer, increase in ridge height by 250mm and two rooflights to front roof. This type of appeal is a householder appeal and as such has 12 weeks for the appeal to be submitted from the decision notice date. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better, we are often unable to accept any appeals that have less than 2 weeks left to appeal, as this would provide insufficient time to produce the appeal to the standard we work to. The refusal reasons given by Royal Borough of Greenwich Council were that The Local Planning Authority considered that; The proposed rear…

Single Storey Front Extension Planning Appeal Buckinghamshire Council Case Study

This planning application was originally validated by Buckinghamshire Council on the 10th August and refused on the 5th October for a Single Storey front extension. This type of appeal is a householder appeal and as such has 12 weeks for the appeal to be submitted from the decision notice date. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better, we are often unable to accept any appeals that have less than 2 weeks left to appeal, as this would provide insufficient time to produce the appeal to the standard we work to. The refusal reasons given by Buckinghamshire Council were that The Local Planning Authority considered that; 1. The surrounding area has distinctively spacious character and where front extensions exist, they are generally aligned with the host dwelling maintaining the existing main…

Hillingdon Council Planning Appeal Case Study 1st Floor Rear Extension

This case started for us when we were contacted by our client after their recent application for a 6m rear extension had been refused by London Borough of Hillingdon Council and a decision notice had been issued to our client refusing the application. The refusal was issued on the 2nd August and as a House Holder Application, the appeal had 12 weeks from the decision notice to be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better. The refusal reasons given by London Borough of Hillingdon Council were by virtue of its size, scale, bulk, depth and proximity to the boundary, would be detrimental to the amenities of the adjoining occupier at 18 Roseville Road, by reason of overdominance, overshadowing, visual intrusion, loss of light and loss…

Rotherham Council Planning Appeal 1st Floor Side Extension Case Study

Rotherham Council Planning Appeal 1st Floor Side Extension Case Study This case started for us when we were contacted by our client after their recent application had been refused by Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council and a decision notice had been issued to our client refusing the application. The refusal was issued on the 24th June and as a House Holder Application, the appeal had 12 weeks from the decision notice to be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate. The client instructed us to proceed on the 3rd August, as they felt the application had not been assessed correctly as revised plans that were provided addressing issues that had been raised by the planning officer were not actually used to determine the application. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better. The refusal…