This planning application was originally validated by Sheffield City Council on the 8th April and refused on the 23rd August for a Two storey side extension and single storey rear extension to a semi detached house. This planning appeal was classed as a House Holder appeal and as such the appellant had 12 weeks from the refusal date to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better. The refusal reasons given by Sheffield City Council were that The Local Planning Authority consider that the proposed two-storey side extension would be overbearing in relation to the adjoining residential property due to the separation distance between, and it would therefore result in an unacceptable effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of that adjoining property. As such…
Posts tagged as “Planning Appeals Video”
This planning application was originally validated by Boston Borough Council on the 14th January and refused on the 6th April for Four Detached Chalet Bungalows outside of the planning boundary. This planning appeal was classed as a Full Application appeal and as such the appellant had 6 months from the refusal date to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. We always recommend leaving at least a whole clear month from instruction to appeal deadline in-case additional investigations are needed, but the more time available the better. The refusal reasons given by Boston Borough Council were very comprehensive and were split over three large paragraphs The first paragraph stated that The application site falls outside of a settlement boundary and is located within the countryside. There is a significant lack of information submitted to provide a sufficient and sound justification for residential development of four dwellings in this location. The development has…